These are all the papers my colleagues and I have published, newest first. Each has its own page, and 93 have a research brief. Two research overviews, Better Meetings and Better Thinking With AI, bring 32 of them together to show what they find as a set.
62 publications
21 publications
52 publications
33 publications
25 publications
9 publications
3 publications
2 publications
2 publications
From 2011 to 2014, while I worked in The University of Queensland's School of Journalism and Communication, I published a bunch of articles about internet and technology trends in The Conversation. The Conversation is a not-for-profit online news site in which researchers write their takes about current issues or events, typically from the perspective of their research area or expertise.
As they say:
The Conversation is an independent source of news and views, sourced from the academic and research community and delivered direct to the public. Our team of professional editors work with university and research institute experts to unlock their knowledge for use by the wider public. Access to independent, high quality, authenticated, explanatory journalism underpins a functioning democracy. Our aim is to promote better understanding of current affairs and complex issues. And hopefully allow for a better quality of public discourse and conversations.
I explored or commented on a wide range of topics, some of which also coincided with my work as a digital rights advocate.
Metacognitive scaffolds, which ask people to set goals and break down a task before AI drafts anything, improved their writing and their later prompting without the scaffold. This productive friction felt harder and less helpful but seemed to pay off. Read the brief
A collaborative workspace can keep every voice, video and edit as a trace that AI can query. Teams could then ask why a note exists, or have AI build tools mid-meeting, like a catch-up summary for a returning colleague. Read the brief
Students who try problems before asking AI and check its answers score higher on later AI-free exams, while copying or ignoring it does not help. Better-prepared students do this more, so equal access may yield unequal learning. Read the brief
Generative AI can be a tool for thought, protecting and augmenting people's reasoning rather than only speeding work. That means judging tools by how they change thinking and learning, not just output, and expecting resistance to designs that add friction. Read the brief
Goal-reflection surveys before and after meetings, or only after, were followed by clearer, better-communicated goals, which may build meeting intentionality, knowing why you meet. Most workers wanted pre-meeting goal prompts, yet adding them brought no measurable gain in rated effectiveness. Read the brief
Goals should become shared, persistent objects that people and AI agents work from, because as AI takes over production, human work shifts to planning, orchestrating and evaluating. Generative AI can handle the fuzzy, evolving goals earlier systems could not. Read the brief
Taking notes, alone or alongside an AI chatbot, helped secondary-school students understand and remember history texts days later better than the chatbot alone. The chatbot may do the summarising for them, yet students enjoyed it more and found it easier. Read the brief
For avatars in mixed-reality work meetings, communicative value matters more than likeness. Over weeks of real meetings, co-workers read each other's moods more accurately with cartoon faces, though realistic faces seemed more expressive. Read the brief
In all-avatar work meetings, meaningful movement beats realism. Webcam-driven nods and smiles made colleagues more comfortable and included than lip-synced or static avatars, though agreement with group decisions did not differ. Read the brief
Meeting intentionality spans a series of meetings, which people link through temporal work by looking back and ahead. Generative AI should carry goals and context from one meeting to the next, in instant recaps and handoffs. Read the brief
Dynamic prompt middleware generates controls for each AI request, such as detail level or learning goal, so people can steer explanations without retyping. People rated it better for steering than fixed controls, though an option's effect stayed hard to predict. Read the brief
Before meetings, AI can build meeting intentionality by asking why a meeting is needed, what success looks like and what could derail it. People clarified goals, prepared, shared agendas and rethought recurring meetings. Read the brief
During meetings, AI that makes goals explicit can support meeting intentionality by helping people spot drift. A passive display of topics and goals was easily overlooked, while active pop-up questions invited action but could interrupt. Read the brief
Generative AI saves knowledge workers effort and shifts their critical thinking from doing tasks to stewarding them, verifying and integrating AI output. Trusting the AI went with less reported critical thinking, and self-confidence with more. Read the brief
AI expert personas can brainstorm with one person, giving the diversity of thought a group brings. In confidence-based turn-taking, each speaks only when confident of adding something new, so they ask questions and build on each other's ideas. Read the brief
Students' generative AI use is shaped by the university around them, not just the tool. Facing unclear, plagiarism-focused guidelines and educators reluctant to discuss AI, students used it as tutor or assistant and set their own unspoken rules. Read the brief
Embracing asymmetry can make hybrid meetings more equitable. In the room each remote person gets a life-size screen at the table, while remotely they enter a 3D replica of the room, choosing their seat and where to look. Read the brief
A handle on a tabletop telepresence robot lets people in the room lift it and move the remote person's view, sharing control. Groups that shared control included the remote person best, and remote people mostly found being moved helpful. Read the brief
Decades of automation research predict where generative AI costs productivity. People shift from producing work to checking output they did not create, unrequested suggestions break concentration, and easy tasks get easier while hard ones can get harder. Read the brief
Prompts asking AI to play a role draw on shared, everyday ways of sorting people into roles, and AI replies reflect that understanding back. Seeing this could help explain AI's mistakes, simulate role-based conduct and help teams understand each other. Read the brief
Generative AI can support meeting intentionality by drafting goals and polling attendees before a meeting, then opening files and apps as talk changes phase. People welcomed the poll but wanted to approve the AI's changes. Read the brief
In virtual meetings, women chatted more and men spoke more, senior women chatted most, and junior staff chatted more when they felt psychologically safe. Chat is a second channel, so valuing and moderating it could widen who is heard. Read the brief
Generative AI can act as a thinking partner for spreadsheet users analysing their own data, cutting search effort and suggesting hypotheses and ways to test them. The hard parts are stating what you want and checking its answers. Read the brief
Seating people in a video meeting around one shared virtual table, as live 3D video from an ordinary webcam, helped them tell who was looking at whom. Yet most preferred the familiar grid as more comfortable. Read the brief
To support meeting intentionality before meetings, generative AI can draft goals and phases from the invitation, focused where attendees disagree. During them, it can lay out each phase's apps and files, on screen or in VR, unless someone objects. Read the brief
Asymmetric hybrid meetings can give each remote person a screen-and-camera seat at the table. Remotely, choosing that seat in a 3D replica of the room and looking around raised their agency, awareness and presence over fixed 2D views. Read the brief
People hold two mental models of meeting goals, seeing meetings as a means to an end or as ends in themselves for connection and discovery. Tools that surface goals from scheduling onward can support meeting intentionality. Read the brief
Generative AI is hard to use partly because it demands metacognition, monitoring and controlling your own thinking as you state goals, break down tasks and judge outputs. Tools could prompt planning and self-evaluation, and demand less by explaining outputs. Read the brief
In mixed reality meetings, realistic avatar faces cut both ways. Co-workers who started with them felt more positive than after switching to cartoon faces, though this seemed to fade, yet realistic faces made colleagues' emotions harder to judge. Read the brief
Ecological validity, how closely a test resembles real use, changes avatar verdicts. People watching a full conversation seemed to forgive more facial animation glitches than when tuning isolated clips, but empathy and possible gender bias swayed their judgements. Read the brief
Seating everyone around one virtual table, each with a fixed place and their own view, can make hybrid meetings feel more like one room than a video grid. People ranked it above standard layouts, though remote attendees liked it less. Read the brief
Participatory prompting grounds generative AI user research in what real systems can do, unlike Wizard-of-Oz. A researcher prompts a working chatbot about a person's own work problem using prepared strategies, and the person reflects on each answer. Read the brief
Headphones can become context-aware input devices by reading signals people already make, like lifting an earcup to mute a call or turning away to blur their video. Reading where someone looks lets the same few gestures control many devices. Read the brief
Telepresence robots went largely unused because they did not fit how office work flowed. With work mostly digital and meetings back to back, video calls were easier, while robots made remote users spectators, too slow to ease into conversations. Read the brief
Spatial audio, playing each voice from where the speaker appears on screen, can make video meetings feel more interactive and more like sharing a room. It restores cues for telling who is speaking, though task scores did not significantly improve. Read the brief
Research creativity grows slowly from long solitary focus, rest and problem-oriented discussions with colleagues when the work needs them. Fixed weekly office days can undermine it, and researchers did not credit brainstorms or watercooler chats with driving it. Read the brief
Rolling out office telepresence robots took weeks of safety, accessibility and security work, yet few used them, as effort likely outweighed value. Hybrid staff socialised on office days, and remote staff met poor audio and few reasons to roam. Read the brief
Presence through a telepresence robot is better understood as being in on the action, able to take part and treated as present, than as feeling there. The robot also made long-term users conspicuous, their mistakes remarked on, not overlooked. Read the brief
AI can take a first pass at coding video of people collaborating, with researchers correcting it. It already tracks who is present and where when cameras see them, but gaze and object detection lag, so it is about half-way there. Read the brief
Skilled freelance work on online platforms is a joint achievement with clients, full of unrecognised invisible work such as scoping tasks and chasing feedback. So freelancers seek repeat clients, who bring steadier income and shared context. Read the brief
The pull between getting work done and staying connected cannot be designed away. Videoconferencing fatigue grew partly because the meeting became a container for everything, so systems should offer recognisably different encounters and let teams find their own balance. Read the brief
Video meetings can make room for arriving, small talk and leave-taking by opening a social space minutes before and after. People drift between groups as video bubbles heard louder up close, though stepping into the meeting itself confused early testers. Read the brief
The timing and speaker labels in video meeting transcripts, read without the words, can map who keeps or cedes the floor when talked over. But timing cannot always tell a supportive 'uh huh' from a bid for the floor. Read the brief
Telepresence-robot visits can build intimacy through everyday togetherness rather than imitating being there. Driving the robot themselves, family visitors can look around and keep the host company on their own initiative, and its slowness can become play. Read the brief
Realistic avatar faces are not automatically better for communication. In mixed reality work meetings, identical body language seemed more useful on realistic faces, yet colleagues who started with cartoon faces came to care less about appearance. Read the brief
Social talk builds collegial bonds, and when working from home, video calls widened and deepened them, though chats had to be scheduled. In group calls, lag and one shared audio channel caused talk-overs, and polite giving way lengthened the silences. Read the brief
Before the pandemic, research on hybrid collaboration, co-located and remote people working together, was scattered under dozens of names and mostly small experiments. Problems it had already found, like remote people becoming an out-group, resurfaced when hybrid work surged. Read the brief
AR/VR telepresence can aim beyond the feeling of being there. In XRmas, a remote family member in VR can move both virtual and physical objects in the family's home and share Christmas activities made magical with holographic effects. Read the brief
Long, large, recurring and morning remote meetings draw more email and side work, often because people must catch up or topics do not concern them. Multitasking can help when it serves the meeting, but its main cost is attention. Read the brief
Video meetings people rate effective are ones where they felt included and took part. An AI dashboard reviewed afterwards can show who spoke and when, which people found most useful, while facial sentiment readings were doubted. Read the brief
Text chat in video meetings lets people share links, work around technical trouble and contribute without interrupting, including those who struggle to get the floor. But side talk can split attention, so norms and moderators voicing key messages could help. Read the brief
Telepresence should offer remote people the comforts of belonging, not just imitate being there. Showing locals a life-size avatar on the robot and the remote person an immersive 360° view imitated presence, but unmet expectations seemed to lower belonging. Read the brief
Text chat alongside a video meeting can let more voices in or distract. Moderators can keep it useful by setting norms upfront, asking about access needs, having key chat spoken aloud and recapping overlooked messages afterwards. Read the brief
Hybrid meetings can be more inclusive if design configures the whole meeting, not just each user, showing everyone the order of talk, expected behaviour and technical state. Otherwise rooms keep meetings moving by sidelining remote colleagues whom the technology fails. Read the brief
A sudden shift in work can be studied as it unfolds with guided diaries, mixing rotating prompts with the same ratings each time, plus weekly polls reacting to early findings. Most diarists dropped out early. Read the brief
Smartphones let people act on time, not just tell it. In spare moments they jump from the present to past photos or future plans, and they record ordinary scenes now as future nostalgia. Read the brief
People driving telepresence robots tend to hint at trouble rather than ask for help, and locals often clear the way unasked. But remote drivers get little feedback on whether they were seen or heard, so hints can go unanswered. Read the brief
Hiring freelancers saves corporate employees time but leaves them stuck between employer, platform and freelancer. Wanting to be fair, they struggle to define unfamiliar tasks and set pay, which pay guidance and examples of good task definitions could ease. Read the brief
Attention in video meetings can be direction, where people look, action, looking to see, be seen or follow the work, or state, overall engagement. Features should start with attention as action, because it feeds engagement. Read the brief
Low engagement in video meetings can be a deliberate social practice, not just a technical failing. Some experienced users join remotely to signal a meeting matters less, using remote participation's limits as cover for listening in and multitasking. Read the brief
VR and AR can bridge people to real places, not only virtual ones, for example by putting a remote person's avatar on a telepresence robot. Read the brief
Overlaying a life-size avatar of the remote person on a telepresence robot, seen through AR glasses, could show body language, where they look and point. The remote person, in a VR headset, sees a live all-round view from the robot. Read the brief
Hybrid meetings falter on technical and social imbalances between room and remote participants, like weaker far-end equipment and whiteboards remote people cannot see. The one seemingly successful meeting avoided them, a large audio call with everyone on their own device. Read the brief
Machines describing meetings to visually impaired colleagues face an interpretation gap. A cue people call simple and objective, such as someone listening to two others, is many pose and gaze labels added up, because social attention is selective sense-making. Read the brief
Politeness theory lets mental health voice agents ask about mood as a caring companion, appealing to people's wish to feel wanted, or as a neutral assistant that avoids imposing. Caring wording risks implying empathy the agent lacks. Read the brief
Skill at work is something people do together with colleagues and tools, not a trait they own. In team chat it shows in timely replies building on earlier messages, so AI designers should ask whether tools extend or replace it. Read the brief
When anyone in a small meeting can steer the shared slides from their phone, people can take turns at control as they do at talk. Gaze, posture and talk kept order, with no technical rules on who controls the screen. Read the brief
Video calling carries an interrogative gaze, a right to look purposefully that relationships grant, so a mother can ask to see your new room. Because being seen can confine talk to the visible, avoiding video can be a reasonable choice. Read the brief
Letting presentation attendees browse slides on their phones and take over the shared screen when ready can lower the cost of taking the floor. People rehearsed privately, caught up after arriving late and kept discussions on the right slide. Read the brief
Video-only messaging suits crafted, gift-like exchanges but imposes a 'tyranny of the everyday'. When every reply must be on camera, being ordinary takes effort, so many people return to lighter apps. Read the brief
Social media can expose how politicians and journalists co-produce news. When video of an interview recorded for several broadcasters showed Ed Miliband giving the same answer to six questions, commentators mostly mocked him, not the shared routine behind it. Read the brief
Categories are social actions in talk, not schemas in the head, since people describe the same thing differently for different purposes. Edwards' reading of Sacks brought this into discursive psychology, which in turn feeds membership categorisation analysis. Read the brief
Video calls should let people bring in any device at hand, like mirroring a phone to the shared screen, since sharing needs often arise unplanned. Connections should be visible to all, but remote people's moves to share were easily missed. Read the brief
Sharing everyday rhythms by sound could ease the isolation of older people living alone. When opening a fridge played a sound in a friend's or daughter's kitchen, people heard routines, built comforting stories and sometimes changed habits out of care. Read the brief
Conversation analysis can show how people repair video-call distortions, such as garbled, frozen or missing sound and picture, in their talk and relationships. This exemplar teaches how to record, transcribe and analyse long-distance couples' video calls. Read the brief
Video-only messaging invites 'Me For You', crafting oneself as worth watching for someone close, which makes treasured gifts like singing for an overseas friend. But everyday chat can stall when every video reply must be worth watching. Read the brief
Video-calling couples handle glitches by invoking two contexts that are always available, the technology and their relationship, to settle what a moment means. Blaming the connection heads off a relational misreading of garbled audio, while frozen video becomes affectionate teasing. Read the brief
Social media spread fast in Australia, whose vast distances have long encouraged early adoption, but media law built for traditional media sits in unresolved conflict with it. Online outrage over a murder case, for example, at times threatened the prosecution. Read the brief
In a university faculty with unrestricted Facebook access, staff who used it at work mostly treated it as a self-regulated break that helped them refocus, not a work tool. Many saw a ban as a sign of distrust. Read the brief
When a teller leaves a story character's relevance unclear, a partner can recast them through 'our relationship', which is always available. So a friendly lifeguard in a boyfriend's video-call story became someone he had to account for. Read the brief
Even for people living alone, home can sound peopled, with everyday sounds heard as neighbours' routines and woven into stories. Because people build stories from sparse cues, technologies for staying in touch could add sounds and rhythms that invite them. Read the brief
Crisis memes spread fast because people refill familiar picture and caption templates to mock power, joke about disasters or criticise online commentary. That gives people a public voice outside traditional media, which restrictive copyright may threaten. Read the brief
Long-distance couples can turn audio and video glitches into intimacy. A frozen screen became cover for a playful tease and a blurry picture sparked a parody, because technology frames talk without determining it. Read the brief
On video calls, deciding whether trouble is technical or social is relational work. Couples can blame the connection for inattention or seeming forgetfulness, a handy escape that works only if the partner accepts it. Read the brief
Visual-first text analytics makes visualisation the start of analysis, not its end product. Software maps a large text's themes and how topics recur over time, and researchers interpret and adjust those maps instead of hand-coding. Read the brief
In conversation analysis data sessions, expertise is a fluid, shared achievement, because spotting something in the data, more than seniority, earns the right to lead the talk. Experts help newcomers build observations and keep their standing through technical summaries. Read the brief
Error messages are brand moments, because failure stirs emotion. Cute mascots like Twitter's Fail Whale showed care and earned publicity, but memorable ones risk tying brands to failure, so designs seem to have shifted to generic faces and robots. Read the brief
Maximizing environmental validity, studying real use in its real setting, means choosing the least intrusive recording. Home video calls were best captured by the researcher's computer joining each call as a silent third party, so people stayed at ease. Read the brief
Doctor and patient roles, from paternalism to independent expertise, are negotiated turn by turn. Giving only a verdict on a test reading casts the patient as relying on the doctor, while giving the number invites them to interpret it themselves. Read the brief
In text chat, silences caused by the system, such as lag, can look just like being ignored. So users trying to get a reply often first rule out technical trouble by reconnecting, greeting again and checking their connection. Read the brief
Online TV forums can give viewers more immediate access to programs, celebrities and each other, but inside the network's commercial space. Networks gain cheap content and publicity, and moderators control access, so viewers often queue to question guests. Read the brief
Unlike a ringing phone, the automatic notice that someone has joined an online chat channel calls on nobody to answer. So people greet widely and creatively to start talking, and many openings meet silence. Read the brief
Text chat need not be impersonal. Internet Relay Chat users adapted relationship-building greetings and farewells by typing out gestures like hugs, but strangers, known only by a nickname, struggled to start conversations. Read the brief