{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "ScholarlyArticle",
 "@id": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/tools-for-thought-understanding-protecting-and-augmenting-human-cognition-with-generative-ai-from-vision-to-implementation.html#paper",
 "aboutThisFile": {
  "whatThisIs": "A research brief: a structured summary of one paper, prepared for seanrintel.com from the paper's full text.",
  "howItWasMade": "This brief was prepared with AI assistance and published by Sean Rintel. It is not the authors' published text.",
  "whatIsVerbatim": "Only 'quote' fields, figure captions and 'abstract' are the authors' own words. Research questions follow the paper's wording where it states them. Takeaway, summaries, answers, definitions and method are the site's plain-language paraphrase.",
  "howItIsChecked": "Before publication every quote is matched against the paper and every number in the brief is found in it. 'verified' is the date of the last check.",
  "howToUse": [
   "For a quick answer, use 'takeaway' and 'questions'. For evidence, use 'findings' (each has a verbatim quote, its location in the paper and a 'url' anchored to that finding on the paper's page).",
   "Locations such as '§5.2, p. 9' refer to the version at 'pageNumbersReferTo'.",
   "For anything not covered here, read the paper itself: 'fullTextSources' lists free versions first.",
   "If 'researchOverview' is present, the paper is part of one of Sean Rintel's research overviews: it gives the overview's thesis, the claims this paper is evidence for and its role in each, and the other papers in the overview.",
   "To find other papers by Sean Rintel, use the catalogue at https://seanrintel.com/publications/index.json."
  ],
  "authorship": "Sean Rintel's role on each paper: lead author when he is first author, sole author when he is the only author, and otherwise senior author. Senior author here means the senior researcher on the team, whatever his position in the author list.",
  "howToCite": "Cite the paper, not this file: use 'citation' or the ready-made 'bibtex' (DOI where given) and name every author. Attribute paraphrase to the paper's findings, and use quotation marks only for 'quote' text."
 },
 "name": "Tools for Thought: Understanding, Protecting, and Augmenting Human Cognition with Generative AI — From Vision to Implementation",
 "author": [
  {
   "@type": "Person",
   "name": "Zelun Tony Zhang"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Person",
   "name": "Nick von Felten"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Person",
   "name": "Leon Reicherts"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Person",
   "name": "Lev Tankelevitch"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Person",
   "name": "Zhitong Guan"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Person",
   "@id": "https://seanrintel.com/#sean-rintel",
   "name": "Sean Rintel",
   "url": "https://seanrintel.com/",
   "sameAs": [
    "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0840-0546",
    "https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=xc25GRgAAAAJ",
    "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q102369654",
    "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/people/serintel/",
    "https://www.linkedin.com/in/seanrintel"
   ]
  },
  {
   "@type": "Person",
   "name": "Yue Fu"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Person",
   "name": "Jessica He"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Person",
   "name": "Kenneth Holstein"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Person",
   "name": "Advait Sarkar"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Person",
   "name": "Gonzalo Ramos"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Person",
   "name": "Anuschka Schmitt"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Person",
   "name": "Anjali Singh"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Person",
   "name": "Haotian Li"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Person",
   "name": "Srishti Palani"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Person",
   "name": "Peter Dalsgaard"
  }
 ],
 "datePublished": "2026-04",
 "doi": "10.1145/3772363.3778733",
 "url": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/tools-for-thought-understanding-protecting-and-augmenting-human-cognition-with-generative-ai-from-vision-to-implementation.html",
 "citation": "Zelun Tony Zhang, Nick von Felten, Leon Reicherts, Lev Tankelevitch, Zhitong Guan, Sean Rintel, Yue Fu, Jessica He, Kenneth Holstein, Advait Sarkar, Gonzalo Ramos, Anuschka Schmitt, Anjali Singh, Haotian Li, Srishti Palani, and Peter Dalsgaard. 2026. Tools for Thought: Understanding, Protecting, and Augmenting Human Cognition with Generative AI — From Vision to Implementation. CHI 2026. https://doi.org/10.1145/3772363.3778733",
 "bibtex": "@inproceedings{zhang2026tools,\nauthor = {Zhang, Zelun Tony and von Felten, Nick and Reicherts, Leon and Tankelevitch, Lev and Guan, Zhitong and Rintel, Sean and Fu, Yue and He, Jessica and Holstein, Kenneth and Sarkar, Advait and Ramos, Gonzalo and Schmitt, Anuschka and Singh, Anjali and Li, Haotian and Palani, Srishti and Dalsgaard, Peter},\ntitle = {Tools for Thought: Understanding, Protecting, and Augmenting Human Cognition with Generative AI — From Vision to Implementation},\nbooktitle = {CHI 2026},\nyear = {2026},\nmonth = {April},\npublisher = {ACM},\nurl = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3772363.3778733},\ndoi = {10.1145/3772363.3778733},\n}",
 "abstract": "Building on the first Tools for Thought (TfT) workshop at CHI 2025, we invite researchers, designers, and practitioners to further operationalise approaches for the design, usage, and evaluation of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) as a TfT. The first goal of the workshop is to put into focus which outcomes a TfT should help people achieve to effectively augment their cognition while avoiding its erosion. Secondly, we will explore how to achieve these outcomes through design and usage strategies. Third, the workshop will also address what a TfT needs for its successful adoption and integration into people’s flow, so that they can benefit from the tools’ potential in their own terms. By focussing on these three research goals, the workshop aims to further develop and advance the multidisciplinary TfT community interested in exploring research frameworks, theories, methods, and approaches to conceptualising, designing, and researching GenAI as a TfT.",
 "fullTextSources": [
  {
   "kind": "freeAccess",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.1145/3772363.3778733",
   "label": "DOI (Free Access)"
  },
  {
   "kind": "freeAccess",
   "url": "https://ai-tools-for-thought.github.io/workshop/assets/Tools_for_Thought_with_Generative_AI_2026_Proposal.pdf",
   "label": "PDF"
  },
  {
   "kind": "freeAccess",
   "url": "https://ai-tools-for-thought.github.io/workshop/",
   "label": "Workshop Website"
  }
 ],
 "fullTextAvailable": true,
 "takeaway": "Generative AI can be a tool for thought (protecting and augmenting reasoning rather than only speeding work), but that means judging tools by how they change thinking, not just output.",
 "researchOverview": {
  "name": "Better Thinking With AI",
  "page": "https://seanrintel.com/better-thinking-with-ai.html",
  "json": "https://seanrintel.com/overviews/better-thinking-with-ai.json",
  "markdown": "https://seanrintel.com/overviews/better-thinking-with-ai.md",
  "thesis": "Generative AI moves people's thinking into stating what they want and judging what they get. The easiest way to use it can help least, so good tools ask people to think first.",
  "claimsThisPaperFeeds": [
   {
    "claim": "What feels helpful is not always what helps",
    "role": "supporting evidence",
    "url": "https://seanrintel.com/better-thinking-with-ai.html#a4"
   },
   {
    "claim": "How people use AI shapes what they learn, and that skill is unevenly spread",
    "role": "supporting evidence",
    "url": "https://seanrintel.com/better-thinking-with-ai.html#a5"
   }
  ],
  "otherPapers": [
   {
    "study": "Review: productivity loss with AI",
    "title": "Ironies of Generative AI: Understanding and Mitigating Productivity Loss in Human-AI Interaction",
    "page": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/ironies-of-generative-ai-understanding-and-mitigating-productivity-loss-in-human-ai-interaction.html",
    "researchBrief": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/ironies-of-generative-ai-understanding-and-mitigating-productivity-loss-in-human-ai-interaction.json"
   },
   {
    "study": "Survey: critical thinking at work",
    "title": "The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge Workers",
    "page": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/the-impact-of-generative-ai-on-critical-thinking-self-reported-reductions-in-cognitive-effort-and-confidence-effects-from-a-survey-of-knowledge-workers.html",
    "researchBrief": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/the-impact-of-generative-ai-on-critical-thinking-self-reported-reductions-in-cognitive-effort-and-confidence-effects-from-a-survey-of-knowledge-workers.json"
   },
   {
    "study": "Position paper: what skill at work means",
    "title": "The Future of Skill: What Is It to Be Skilled at Work?",
    "page": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/the-future-of-skill-what-is-it-to-be-skilled-at-work.html",
    "researchBrief": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/the-future-of-skill-what-is-it-to-be-skilled-at-work.json"
   },
   {
    "study": "Conceptual analysis: metacognition and AI",
    "title": "The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AI",
    "page": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/the-metacognitive-demands-and-opportunities-of-generative-ai.html",
    "researchBrief": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/the-metacognitive-demands-and-opportunities-of-generative-ai.json"
   },
   {
    "study": "Prompting study: AI-assisted data analysis",
    "title": "“It’s like a rubber duck that talks back”: Understanding Generative AI-Assisted Data Analysis Workflows through a Participatory Prompting Study",
    "page": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/its-like-a-rubber-duck-that-talks-back-understanding-generative-ai-assisted-data-analysis-workflows-through-a-participatory-prompting-study.html",
    "researchBrief": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/its-like-a-rubber-duck-that-talks-back-understanding-generative-ai-assisted-data-analysis-workflows-through-a-participatory-prompting-study.json"
   },
   {
    "study": "Method paper: participatory prompting",
    "title": "Participatory prompting: a user-centric research method for eliciting AI assistance opportunities in knowledge workflows",
    "page": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/participatory-prompting-a-user-centric-research-method-for-eliciting-ai-assistance-opportunities-in-knowledge-workflows.html",
    "researchBrief": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/participatory-prompting-a-user-centric-research-method-for-eliciting-ai-assistance-opportunities-in-knowledge-workflows.json"
   },
   {
    "study": "Commentary: role-based prompts",
    "title": "Productivity implications for generative AI role-based prompts as a networked hermeneutic (Commentary)",
    "page": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/productivity-implications-for-generative-ai-role-based-prompts-as-a-networked-hermeneutic.html",
    "researchBrief": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/productivity-implications-for-generative-ai-role-based-prompts-as-a-networked-hermeneutic.json"
   },
   {
    "study": "Randomised trial: how students learn with AI",
    "title": "Learning behavior accounts for background-related advantage in AI-assisted education",
    "page": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/learning-behavior-accounts-for-background-related-advantage-in-ai-assisted-education.html",
    "researchBrief": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/learning-behavior-accounts-for-background-related-advantage-in-ai-assisted-education.json"
   },
   {
    "study": "Randomised experiment: note-taking versus AI for reading",
    "title": "Effects of LLM Use and Note-Taking On Reading Comprehension and Memory: A Randomised Experiment in Secondary Schools",
    "page": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/effects-of-llm-use-and-note-taking-on-reading-comprehension-and-memory-a-randomised-experiment-in-secondary-schools.html",
    "researchBrief": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/effects-of-llm-use-and-note-taking-on-reading-comprehension-and-memory-a-randomised-experiment-in-secondary-schools.json"
   },
   {
    "study": "Interviews: AI in higher education",
    "title": "The New Calculator? Practices, Norms, and Implications of Generative AI in Higher Education",
    "page": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/the-new-calculator-practices-norms-and-implications-of-generative-ai-in-higher-education.html",
    "researchBrief": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/the-new-calculator-practices-norms-and-implications-of-generative-ai-in-higher-education.json"
   },
   {
    "study": "Randomised experiment: scaffolds for AI-assisted writing",
    "title": "Metacognitive Scaffolds Create Productive Friction for AI-Assisted Knowledge Work",
    "page": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/metacognitive-scaffolds-create-productive-friction-for-ai-assisted-knowledge-work.html",
    "researchBrief": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/metacognitive-scaffolds-create-productive-friction-for-ai-assisted-knowledge-work.json"
   },
   {
    "study": "Lab study: prompt refinement controls",
    "title": "Dynamic Prompt Middleware: Contextual Prompt Refinement Controls for Comprehension Tasks",
    "page": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/dynamic-prompt-middleware-contextual-prompt-refinement-controls-for-comprehension-tasks.html",
    "researchBrief": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/dynamic-prompt-middleware-contextual-prompt-refinement-controls-for-comprehension-tasks.json"
   },
   {
    "study": "System design: AI agents for diverse ideas",
    "title": "YES AND: A Generative AI Multi-Agent Framework for Enhancing Diversity of Thought in Individual Ideation for Problem-Solving Through Confidence-Based Agent Turn-Taking",
    "page": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/yes-and-a-generative-ai-multi-agent-framework-for-enhancing-diversity-of-thought-in-individual-ideation-for-problem-solving-through-confidence-based-agent-turn-taking.html",
    "researchBrief": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/yes-and-a-generative-ai-multi-agent-framework-for-enhancing-diversity-of-thought-in-individual-ideation-for-problem-solving-through-confidence-based-agent-turn-taking.json"
   },
   {
    "study": "Interviews and experiment: how people and machines interpret",
    "title": "Meeting in the Middle: The Interpretation Gap Between People and Machines",
    "page": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/meeting-in-the-middle-the-interpretation-gap-between-people-and-machines.html",
    "researchBrief": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/meeting-in-the-middle-the-interpretation-gap-between-people-and-machines.json"
   }
  ]
 },
 "whyItMatters": {
  "stateOfTheArt": {
   "summary": "Generative AI use has documented costs to thinking and learning, but well-designed use can augment cognition. The first Tools for Thought workshop at CHI 2025 began mapping these effects.",
   "quote": "Prior work has found worsened learning outcomes and decreased metacognitive effort resulting from GenAI use, both in knowledge work and in education",
   "location": "§1, p. 2"
  },
  "contribution": {
   "summary": "This second workshop moves from mapping the field to operationalising it. It focuses on concrete strategies, outcomes and measures, and on adoption of generative AI as a tool for thought.",
   "quote": "our aim in this year's iteration is to transition from the foundational to the operational",
   "location": "§1, p. 2"
  },
  "whoCares": {
   "summary": "Researchers, designers, practitioners and provocateurs working on generative AI and human cognition.",
   "quote": "we invite researchers, designers, practitioners, and provocateurs to submit a paper",
   "location": "§8, p. 6"
  }
 },
 "researchQuestions": [
  "What makes a TfT effective?",
  "What are the concrete mechanisms and appropriate outcomes of TfTs?",
  "How can we establish and validate sensible metrics to measure their impact on human cognition?"
 ],
 "concepts": [
  {
   "term": "Tools for Thought (TfT)",
   "definition": "What the authors mean by the term:",
   "quote": "we refer to the characterisation of (sociotechnical) systems that put special emphasis on their impact on cognition - in both the short and long term - over mere productivity",
   "location": "§1, p. 2"
  },
  {
   "term": "Process-oriented support",
   "definition": "A design strategy that emerged from the first workshop:",
   "quote": "This strategy focusses on supporting users to reason forward to their own solution, rather than backward from an AI-generated one.",
   "location": "§1.1, p. 2"
  },
  {
   "term": "Usage strategies",
   "definition": "The second type of strategy, which applies even to general-purpose chatbots:",
   "quote": "Users themselves can also employ workflows or activities involving GenAI in a way that augments or protects their cognition",
   "location": "§1.1, p. 2"
  },
  {
   "term": "Intermediary, cognitive and task outcomes",
   "definition": "Three types of outcome of using a tool for thought, drawn from Yvonne Rogers and colleagues: artefacts that scaffold thinking, changes in understanding and skills, and task performance.",
   "quote": "Cognitive Outcomes: Changes in understanding, learning, or cognitive skills, such as critical thinking and metacognitive engagement.",
   "location": "§1.2, p. 3"
  }
 ],
 "method": {
  "design": "Workshop proposal for CHI 2026, building on the first Tools for Thought workshop at CHI 2025.",
  "setting": "A 180-minute workshop in two 90-minute sessions, organised around small groups of four to five participants clustered by theme from their submissions and Miro boards.",
  "sample": "Submissions of up to four pages on at least one of three themes (strategies, outcomes, adoption). A target of 45 participants.",
  "analysis": "Groups work on a tangible output of their choice (for example a prototype, framework, design principles or theory) and pitch it to the plenary. Afterwards, a gap-finding exercise and a public synthesis report."
 },
 "findings": [
  {
   "headline": "How AI is used matters for learning.",
   "summary": "Prior studies the authors cite show that generative AI's effect on learning is mixed. Using it for direct solutions can impair learning, while using it to seek explanations can help. Perceptions can also mislead:",
   "quote": "students may perceive LLMs as more helpful than traditional study methods, such as note-taking, even when their learning outcomes are worse",
   "location": "§1, p. 2",
   "url": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/tools-for-thought-understanding-protecting-and-augmenting-human-cognition-with-generative-ai-from-vision-to-implementation.html#at-s1-p-2",
   "cite": "Zelun Tony Zhang, Nick von Felten, Leon Reicherts, Lev Tankelevitch, Zhitong Guan, Sean Rintel, Yue Fu, Jessica He, Kenneth Holstein, Advait Sarkar, Gonzalo Ramos, Anuschka Schmitt, Anjali Singh, Haotian Li, Srishti Palani, and Peter Dalsgaard. 2026. Tools for Thought: Understanding, Protecting, and Augmenting Human Cognition with Generative AI — From Vision to Implementation. CHI 2026. https://doi.org/10.1145/3772363.3778733 (§1, p. 2)"
  },
  {
   "headline": "Good examples, hard to transfer.",
   "summary": "Many tools for thought presented at the first workshop were specific designs that did not easily carry over to other domains or problems, so the authors ask how to turn them into reusable strategies.",
   "quote": "How can we systematise these examples into tangible strategies that can reliably lead to effective and positive TfTs, given a new problem domain or context?",
   "location": "§1.1, p. 2",
   "url": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/tools-for-thought-understanding-protecting-and-augmenting-human-cognition-with-generative-ai-from-vision-to-implementation.html#at-s1-1-p-2",
   "cite": "Zelun Tony Zhang, Nick von Felten, Leon Reicherts, Lev Tankelevitch, Zhitong Guan, Sean Rintel, Yue Fu, Jessica He, Kenneth Holstein, Advait Sarkar, Gonzalo Ramos, Anuschka Schmitt, Anjali Singh, Haotian Li, Srishti Palani, and Peter Dalsgaard. 2026. Tools for Thought: Understanding, Protecting, and Augmenting Human Cognition with Generative AI — From Vision to Implementation. CHI 2026. https://doi.org/10.1145/3772363.3778733 (§1.1, p. 2)"
  },
  {
   "headline": "Judge thinking, not just output.",
   "summary": "The authors argue that a tool for thought should be judged by how it shapes, supports or extends thinking in activities such as decision-making, reflection or exploration, not only by whether the task gets done.",
   "quote": "for example, when supporting a sensemaking activity by taking the role of a socratic tutor and facilitating users' critical engagement with a topic",
   "location": "§1.2, p. 3",
   "url": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/tools-for-thought-understanding-protecting-and-augmenting-human-cognition-with-generative-ai-from-vision-to-implementation.html#at-s1-2-p-3",
   "cite": "Zelun Tony Zhang, Nick von Felten, Leon Reicherts, Lev Tankelevitch, Zhitong Guan, Sean Rintel, Yue Fu, Jessica He, Kenneth Holstein, Advait Sarkar, Gonzalo Ramos, Anuschka Schmitt, Anjali Singh, Haotian Li, Srishti Palani, and Peter Dalsgaard. 2026. Tools for Thought: Understanding, Protecting, and Augmenting Human Cognition with Generative AI — From Vision to Implementation. CHI 2026. https://doi.org/10.1145/3772363.3778733 (§1.2, p. 3)"
  },
  {
   "headline": "Evaluation must be pluralistic.",
   "summary": "Some effects on thinking are hard to quantify or appear only in users' own accounts of what they achieved, so evaluation could combine process tracing, analysis of what people produce, cognitive assessments and long-term studies.",
   "quote": "This calls for evaluation methods that are flexible and pluralistic, capturing not just what users produce, but also how they think and change in the process.",
   "location": "§1.2, p. 3",
   "url": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/tools-for-thought-understanding-protecting-and-augmenting-human-cognition-with-generative-ai-from-vision-to-implementation.html#at-s1-2-p-3-2",
   "cite": "Zelun Tony Zhang, Nick von Felten, Leon Reicherts, Lev Tankelevitch, Zhitong Guan, Sean Rintel, Yue Fu, Jessica He, Kenneth Holstein, Advait Sarkar, Gonzalo Ramos, Anuschka Schmitt, Anjali Singh, Haotian Li, Srishti Palani, and Peter Dalsgaard. 2026. Tools for Thought: Understanding, Protecting, and Augmenting Human Cognition with Generative AI — From Vision to Implementation. CHI 2026. https://doi.org/10.1145/3772363.3778733 (§1.2, p. 3)"
  },
  {
   "headline": "Friction meets resistance.",
   "summary": "Citing earlier studies, the authors argue that designs adding friction to improve thinking can meet resistance, both from users who dislike the extra work and from stakeholders who expect AI to speed work up.",
   "quote": "A global study of 2500 executives and workers found that 96% of C-suite executives expect AI to boost productivity",
   "location": "§1.3, p. 3",
   "url": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/tools-for-thought-understanding-protecting-and-augmenting-human-cognition-with-generative-ai-from-vision-to-implementation.html#at-s1-3-p-3",
   "cite": "Zelun Tony Zhang, Nick von Felten, Leon Reicherts, Lev Tankelevitch, Zhitong Guan, Sean Rintel, Yue Fu, Jessica He, Kenneth Holstein, Advait Sarkar, Gonzalo Ramos, Anuschka Schmitt, Anjali Singh, Haotian Li, Srishti Palani, and Peter Dalsgaard. 2026. Tools for Thought: Understanding, Protecting, and Augmenting Human Cognition with Generative AI — From Vision to Implementation. CHI 2026. https://doi.org/10.1145/3772363.3778733 (§1.3, p. 3)"
  }
 ],
 "questions": [
  {
   "question": "Does using AI like ChatGPT make people worse at thinking and learning?",
   "answer": "It depends on how it is used. Studies have found worse learning and less metacognitive effort with some generative AI use. But using it to seek explanations, rather than direct solutions, can help learning.",
   "source": "Zelun Tony Zhang, Nick von Felten, Leon Reicherts, Lev Tankelevitch, Zhitong Guan, Sean Rintel, Yue Fu, Jessica He, Kenneth Holstein, Advait Sarkar, Gonzalo Ramos, Anuschka Schmitt, Anjali Singh, Haotian Li, Srishti Palani, and Peter Dalsgaard. 2026. Tools for Thought: Understanding, Protecting, and Augmenting Human Cognition with Generative AI — From Vision to Implementation. CHI 2026. https://doi.org/10.1145/3772363.3778733",
   "basedOn": [
    {
     "location": "§1, p. 2",
     "url": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/tools-for-thought-understanding-protecting-and-augmenting-human-cognition-with-generative-ai-from-vision-to-implementation.html#at-s1-p-2"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "question": "How should we judge whether an AI tool helps people think?",
   "answer": "The authors argue for looking beyond task performance to how a tool shapes thinking. That means the artefacts that scaffold thought, changes in understanding and skills, and task outcomes. Flexible methods such as process tracing, artefact analysis and longitudinal studies can capture these.",
   "source": "Zelun Tony Zhang, Nick von Felten, Leon Reicherts, Lev Tankelevitch, Zhitong Guan, Sean Rintel, Yue Fu, Jessica He, Kenneth Holstein, Advait Sarkar, Gonzalo Ramos, Anuschka Schmitt, Anjali Singh, Haotian Li, Srishti Palani, and Peter Dalsgaard. 2026. Tools for Thought: Understanding, Protecting, and Augmenting Human Cognition with Generative AI — From Vision to Implementation. CHI 2026. https://doi.org/10.1145/3772363.3778733",
   "basedOn": [
    {
     "location": "§1.2, p. 3",
     "url": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/tools-for-thought-understanding-protecting-and-augmenting-human-cognition-with-generative-ai-from-vision-to-implementation.html#at-s1-2-p-3"
    },
    {
     "location": "§1.2, p. 3",
     "url": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/tools-for-thought-understanding-protecting-and-augmenting-human-cognition-with-generative-ai-from-vision-to-implementation.html#at-s1-2-p-3-2"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "question": "Why might people resist AI tools designed to make them think harder?",
   "answer": "Because added friction means extra work. Designs that add friction can meet resistance even when they aim to improve thinking, from users who dislike the effort and from stakeholders who expect AI to accelerate work.",
   "source": "Zelun Tony Zhang, Nick von Felten, Leon Reicherts, Lev Tankelevitch, Zhitong Guan, Sean Rintel, Yue Fu, Jessica He, Kenneth Holstein, Advait Sarkar, Gonzalo Ramos, Anuschka Schmitt, Anjali Singh, Haotian Li, Srishti Palani, and Peter Dalsgaard. 2026. Tools for Thought: Understanding, Protecting, and Augmenting Human Cognition with Generative AI — From Vision to Implementation. CHI 2026. https://doi.org/10.1145/3772363.3778733",
   "basedOn": [
    {
     "location": "§1.3, p. 3",
     "url": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/tools-for-thought-understanding-protecting-and-augmenting-human-cognition-with-generative-ai-from-vision-to-implementation.html#at-s1-3-p-3"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "question": "What is a 'tool for thought'?",
   "answer": "A system designed and judged mainly by its short- and long-term effect on people's thinking (such as reasoning, memory, ideation or critical thinking), rather than by productivity alone. Even a general-purpose chatbot can serve this way if people use it in ways that protect their cognition.",
   "source": "Zelun Tony Zhang, Nick von Felten, Leon Reicherts, Lev Tankelevitch, Zhitong Guan, Sean Rintel, Yue Fu, Jessica He, Kenneth Holstein, Advait Sarkar, Gonzalo Ramos, Anuschka Schmitt, Anjali Singh, Haotian Li, Srishti Palani, and Peter Dalsgaard. 2026. Tools for Thought: Understanding, Protecting, and Augmenting Human Cognition with Generative AI — From Vision to Implementation. CHI 2026. https://doi.org/10.1145/3772363.3778733",
   "basedOn": [
    {
     "location": "§1.1, p. 2",
     "url": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/tools-for-thought-understanding-protecting-and-augmenting-human-cognition-with-generative-ai-from-vision-to-implementation.html#at-s1-1-p-2"
    },
    {
     "location": "§1.2, p. 3",
     "url": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/tools-for-thought-understanding-protecting-and-augmenting-human-cognition-with-generative-ai-from-vision-to-implementation.html#at-s1-2-p-3"
    }
   ]
  }
 ],
 "cites": [
  {
   "url": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/effects-of-llm-use-and-note-taking-on-reading-comprehension-and-memory-a-randomised-experiment-in-secondary-schools.html",
   "title": "Effects of LLM Use and Note-Taking On Reading Comprehension and Memory: A Randomised Experiment in Secondary Schools",
   "location": "p. 6"
  },
  {
   "url": "https://seanrintel.com/publications/the-impact-of-generative-ai-on-critical-thinking-self-reported-reductions-in-cognitive-effort-and-confidence-effects-from-a-survey-of-knowledge-workers.html",
   "title": "The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge Workers",
   "location": "p. 6"
  }
 ],
 "quantitative": [
  {
   "measure": "CHI 2025 Tools for Thought workshop: registered participants, accepted submissions, submissions received",
   "value": "56 officially registered participants, with 34 accepted submissions and 72 submissions received",
   "location": "§7, p. 5"
  }
 ],
 "implications": [
  {
   "summary": "The field needs concrete pathways toward generative AI as an effective and positive tool for thought.",
   "quote": "There is a need for concrete pathways toward GenAI as an effective and positive TfT.",
   "location": "§1, p. 2"
  },
  {
   "summary": "Strategies should be found that let people see value in, and attain, both productivity and cognitive outcomes.",
   "quote": "How might we manage potential trade-offs between productivity and cognitive outcomes to maximise the likelihood of their successful integration and sustained use?",
   "location": "§1.3, p. 3"
  }
 ],
 "limitations": [
  {
   "summary": "Tools for thought are an emerging area, and gaps in understanding are expected.",
   "quote": "As TfTs are an emerging research area, we expect to find gaps in our understanding of them.",
   "location": "§1, p. 2"
  }
 ],
 "figures": [],
 "pageNumbersReferTo": "https://ai-tools-for-thought.github.io/workshop/assets/Tools_for_Thought_with_Generative_AI_2026_Proposal.pdf",
 "verified": "2026-10-25",
 "studyFigure": {
  "about": "The opening figure on this paper's page, made for the site with AI assistance from this verified brief. It is not the paper's own figure. Evidence entries index this file's quantitative, findings and limitations arrays.",
  "study": {
   "kind": "single",
   "heading": "The paper",
   "summary": "A proposal for a CHI 2026 workshop on generative AI as a tool for thought, meaning technology judged by its effect on thinking, not only productivity. It builds on a first workshop at CHI 2025.",
   "steps": [
    {
     "label": "Draws on",
     "detail": "Prior studies of generative AI and learning, and the first workshop, which had 56 registered participants and 34 accepted submissions."
    },
    {
     "label": "Examines",
     "detail": "Three themes: strategies for designing and using such tools, the outcomes to measure, and adoption."
    },
    {
     "label": "Plans",
     "detail": "A 180-minute workshop for a target of 45 participants, in small groups that each make and pitch a tangible output."
    }
   ]
  },
  "findings": {
   "heading": "What the paper argues",
   "legend": null,
   "stages": [
    {
     "title": "What is known",
     "sub": "prior studies the proposal cites",
     "items": [
      {
       "dir": "none",
       "text": "Studies cited in the proposal suggest how generative AI is used matters for learning.",
       "detail": "Using it for direct solutions can impair learning, while seeking explanations can help. Students may rate AI as more helpful even when learning is worse.",
       "evidence": [
        "findings[0]"
       ]
      },
      {
       "dir": "none",
       "text": "The paper notes that many tools from the first workshop did not easily transfer.",
       "detail": "These tools were specific designs for particular domains. The paper asks how to turn such examples into reusable strategies.",
       "evidence": [
        "findings[1]"
       ]
      }
     ]
    },
    {
     "title": "What the field needs",
     "sub": "the proposal's arguments",
     "items": [
      {
       "dir": "none",
       "text": "The paper argues tools for thought should be judged by how they shape thinking.",
       "detail": "Judging should cover activities such as decision-making, reflection and exploration, not only whether the task gets done.",
       "evidence": [
        "findings[2]"
       ]
      },
      {
       "dir": "none",
       "text": "The paper argues evaluation of tools for thought must combine several methods.",
       "detail": "Some effects on thinking are hard to quantify. Evaluation could combine process tracing, analysis of what people produce, cognitive assessments and long-term studies.",
       "evidence": [
        "findings[3]"
       ]
      },
      {
       "dir": "none",
       "text": "The paper argues designs that add friction to improve thinking can meet resistance.",
       "detail": "Users may dislike the extra work. A cited global study found 96% of senior executives expect AI to boost productivity.",
       "evidence": [
        "findings[4]"
       ]
      }
     ]
    }
   ]
  },
  "keyTerm": "tools for thought",
  "takeaway": "Generative AI tools for thought can protect and extend people's thinking as well as speed up work. Judging tools by their effect on thinking and learning can guide better design."
 }
}